I can see the light at
the end of the tunnel. Advocacy in Action is almost wrapping up. This whole
process has been filled with a lot of learning curves for me as an instructor.
Throughout the time watching my groups develop, work together, and panic at the
end I now have time to reflect on how their group development went.
Some groups are wrapping
up better than others. The donation collections team is currently hanging on by
threads with a mere three active members in their group. One student comes
every now and then and the other two members are MIA. Now all
that’s left to do is some damage control. I don’t want them to leave with a
sour taste in their mouth when they think of small groups. With less than one
month remaining I’m having to think about how I can end on a positive note with
working in groups. I know there’s still hope left for them. So now the
question I’m asking myself is do I keep them in their AIA groups or put them in
random groups for think/pair/share and other classroom activities? Can they
recover from some not so great small group experiences?
I hope the answer is yes.
While some groups may
have struggled to get acclimated to their group climate, they were still able to
reach their end goal (well almost, because they still have some remaining tasks to complete). Instead of thinking about the things that I thought could have
been improved on in the AIA groups, I need to also pull the positives from
them. I do have to keep in mind that not all their group work was a bust. Cooper
and Simmonds (2003) noted that some advantages of being in small groups include “enhancing
student motivation and fostering positive attitudes towards the subject matter”
(p. 118). By having them working in small groups for an extended period of time
I saw students talk more in class, talk to each other after class, and simply interact as colleagues. Placing my students in small groups in a sense
helped the class run a little smoother because they had others to rely on and
get information from. Small groups helped my students foster classroom
relationships and work together to achieve their goal.
Way back when we covered
instructional strategies, I realize that information has been following me ever
since. With Advocacy in Action groups, I saw the good, bad, and ugly that came
with their informal roles. It wasn’t like the activity we did in pedagogy
because these group members weren’t acting out a role, they were these roles. Cooper and Simmonds
(2003) noted that there are three types of informal roles from task,
maintenance, and disruptive. (p. 192). During in-class workdays I saw students
who dominated group conversations, those who barely talked because they had
headphones in, and those who were actively involved. At one point a group
member from the leadership team asked me “am I talking too much?” I was
surprised at his self-awareness but none the less very thankful that he was
looking to better his participation in the group. To me, he was teetering the
line of being a stagehog and being an initiator-contributor. Not an ideal or
even functional combo, I know. Luckily this student was willing to work on how
he interacted with his group and change some of his approaches. Of course, this
wasn’t the case for all the groups considering a few of them were still trying
to get group members to answer their GroupMe. I just wanted to go to each group
and point out the ways they could improve their dynamic but I knew I needed to
let them function independently. I’m wondering if they recognized the stagehog,
the coordinator, the feeling expresser, or the cynic throughout their time
working together. Now that the project is almost over, I will have the
opportunity to read their peer evaluations and see if they identify and talk
indirectly about any of these informal roles.
Yes, there are pros and
cons to small groups. While I’ve been nitpicking at the cons, I know I need to
also count for the pros. Having my students work in a group for the majority of the semester sure
has been a learning experience. Only their evaluations will tell what this
experience was like for them. I’m optimistic that the majority of them found this project to be successful. Here’s to hoping.
Now, it’s time to start
wrapping up and helping my students reach the finish line successfully. Less
the one moth, folks.
#andthatstheT
Small groups can be a nightmare to both work with and in. Having this be the majority of the class semester was something I was worried about as well but it was absolutely amazing getting to see how these students grew within the group, both within their roles and individually as students. It's wonderful seeing a student who didn't speak in the beginning of class become confident and comfortable talking to their team members, going as far as to even leading the discussion.
ReplyDelete