As I have
reflected on Bell and Golombisky’s (2004) article from last week, I’ve tried to
remember times when I have played the Good Girl. I know I most certainly played
the role of the Good Girl in high school and this likely persisted even into my
early college years, but in trying to remember what that experience was like,
it seems like ages ago since I’ve have enacted the Good Girl performance. After
all, it did not take me long in the Communication Studies Department at LSU to give
up the Good Girl. However, in the time spent with my family over Thanksgiving,
I’ve been (somewhat painfully) reminded of how close the Good Girl still is to
me. Basically, Good Girls run rampant in my family.
Bell and
Golombisky (2004) describe the Good Girl as “the women in our classes who work
hard to be perfect” (p. 296). A prime example is my twin sister Camille.
Camille works exceptionally hard in school, partially because of the pleasure
it brings her but also because she views making good grades as evidence to
others that she is intelligent. You see, Camille, despite knowing how smart she
is, is convinced that others do not pick up on this upon meeting her. My
sister’s suspicions that others (particularly males) do not view her as
intelligent and perhaps the actual perception on the part of those others that
she is not intelligent is undoubtedly tied to the message our culture sends all
young girls: femininity does not equal intelligence. I recognized this as
problematic and talked it through with my sister long before knowing to call it
Good Girl behavior. She has for the most part been receptive to the insights I
have tried to share with her about gender stereotypes and male privilege. Camille’s
positive reception of these conversations gave me hope that we could continue
having such conversations. To my dismay, this Thanksgiving break, I learned
just how deeply the women in my family have internalized the Good Girl.
There are,
according to these Bell and Golombisky (2004), three different enactments of
the Good Girl. They are 1) self-imposed silences, 2) learned helplessness, and
3) nurturing urges to serve and protect. Of the three, the women in my family
perform the Good Girl who seeks to serve and protect men.
Here are some
examples of the Good Girl from over the break:
When trying to
discuss how hegemonic masculinity contributes to gun violence, my sister
replied, “If we keep demonizing men, they’re going to end up living up to those
standards.”
When discussing
Baylor University’s recent mishandling of the sexual assault of a
student-athlete by another student-athlete, my aunt said, “But if he’s wrongly
accused, that’s catastrophic for his life.”
More broadly, my
mother continuously upholds the authority of my brother and father’s bigoted
voices while my queer voice is perpetually silenced.
Anything to
avoid hurting the feelings of the men in my family. (This is ironic given that
hegemonic masculinity would have us believe that men don’t have feelings.)
Perhaps it is
only after reading Bell and Golombisky’s (2004) article that I am starting to
notice how frequently the Good Girl rears its ugly (pretty?) head. Whatever the
case, I couldn’t escape the Good Girl this past week at home and was repeatedly
silenced by other women in my family for the sake of serving and protecting the
egos of men. Reluctantly, I realize that I was that Good Girl once, and that I
didn’t drop the Good Girl performance until I was in college. So, I am
committing myself to actively making attempts to engage the Good Girls in my
classroom through the many techniques offered by Bell and Golombisky (2004),
such as Think/Pair/Share, Write an Example, Make a List, Think of Everything
You Know About, and the penny activity we did in class. I hope the rest of you
who are instructors will take time to consider how you can incorporate these
activities into your lesson plans, and if you are doing so already, evaluate
how these practices have worked to engage the Good Girls in your classes.
My apologies if
this sounds a lot like venting. Thanksgiving was rough. Gobble gobble.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI am definitely going to keep my eye out for this. I had a non-traditional student in 3010 that spent the first three weeks of class apologizing to me every time see asked me a question. I told her she didn't need to do that, even time she did. I think this falls under the second category, but I'm not sure. I'd like to talk you with you about this more. Also...
ReplyDeleteI am definitely going to keep my eye out for this. I had a non-traditional student in 3010 that spent the first three weeks of class apologizing to me every time see asked me a question. I told her she didn't need to do that, even time she did. I think this falls under the second category, but I'm not sure. I'd like to talk you with you about this more.