I have come to the realization that the teacher is a
paradoxical and oppressive force in the classroom. This might sound negative in
some fashion, and its true in some ways. However, I feel this is an
unintentional consequence of the position of teacher. A general assumption
given to the positions of teacher and student is that the teacher has
information, and that the students are either unfamiliar, or unversed with this
information. Of course this is not all encompassing, and I’m not so pompous to
believe that my students couldn’t be knowledgeable in the information that I teach
prior to entering my classroom.
According to
Freir (2005) a method of freeing the oppressed (students in this context) from that
of the oppressors (me as teacher), is for the oppressors to work in solidarity
with the oppressed. To put this in the current context, I as the teacher have
an assumed knowledge, which the students will need to know in order to pass the
class, and for the most part, get their college degrees. The students must
acquire enough of the information and be able to articulate it in a way that will
allow them to pass the required course work, and get the necessary grades.
If I am the one who grades and determines whether or
not the student passes, but also the one who is supposed to be assisting them
in their acquisition and articulation of the knowledge necessary to pass, am I
placing the students in an oppressive cycle through bad grades, knowing that I could
be partially responsible for said grades? This is not to say that I wholly
place the responsibility on myself. It is the requirement of the students to
read and study the necessary materials. But, as I review the grade book,
mulling over the particularities of assignments, I find myself conflicted as we
near the end of the semester. Who will walk away victorious or in defeat? Is it
my fault? Is that a bad thing?
Sources
Freire, P. (1970/2000). Pedagogy
of the oppressed: 30th Anniversary Edition. New
York: Continuum.
No comments:
Post a Comment