“And, when worlds collide, when we must speak across what may feel like profound ideological difference, we look to dialogue—to loving inquiry and unflinching self-relexivity—to render that difference meaningful and (re)act, in relation, to it.” (Fassett & Warren, 2007, p.56)
Productive and inquisitive dialogue is a necessary ingredient
for creating a collaborative learning environment in which both students and
teachers can act together to transform the world. Although a collaborative
learning environment may be ideal for an educator who wishes to move beyond the
traditional pedagogical style of information “banking,” the heavy responsibility
of initiating, facilitating, and managing valuable dialogue in the classroom may
be perceived as a daunting and overwhelming task.
If the implementation of collaborative learning in your classroom is perceived as a distant ideal, the strategic (re)use of immediacy may be a small catalyst that encourages you to take the plunge.
The practice of immediacy in the classroom may be used to
create a supportive classroom climate, encourage student participation and
contribution, and negotiate power constructs in the classroom. This may help ease the fear
of vulnerability that accompanies practicing critical communication pedagogy.
A supportive classroom climate is essential for dialogue. If students do not feel comfortable enough to share their own opinions, examples, and experiences, dialogue does not occur. To create an environment that encourages collaborative learning and transformative dialogue, immediacy may be used to lessen the psychological distance between the teacher and student. The tactics included in this process may be things such as soliciting students’ opinions on issues related to the course or allowing students an opportunity to share information about themselves with the class.
As an educator, it is important to remember that each
individual student is not inherently brave enough to speak up in the classroom
and participate in dialogue. In order to engage fearful students (although no
two are the same), a helpful tactic may be to solicit the opinions of all
students and show supportive verbal and nonverbal immediate feedback. This may
be done by an acknowledging nod of the head, a reassuring smile, or a verbal
assurance of appreciation (“That’s a great point!” or “That is an interesting
way of looking at it”).
The practice of immediacy is naturally incorporated in the humanizing
quality of critical communication pedagogy. By viewing students as individual
and subjective beings, the need for subjective, loving, and understanding
behavior from the teacher is imperative. By practicing supportive and immediate
behaviors--such as the use of inclusive pronouns (“us” and “we”) and providing prompt
feedback—the traditional psychological distance that (traditional) power
structures create may be lessened.
#ImmediacyAndLearning
Resources
Fassett, D. L., & Warren, J. T. (2007).
Critical communication pedagogy.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lauren, love this and love your #immediacyandlearning. From my experience, immediacy is the most crucial factor in establishing a supportive climate within the classroom. I will say that I am not quick to share anything other than a surface level topic with just anyone. By someone taking the time to get to know me and validating my thoughts and opinions, I will allow them some access into my true thoughts. I try to remember this when I am teaching. It is important for me to validate each person when they share, especially something that may be personal to them. I also try to remember this as a student, as it is easier for me to share my thoughts in front of my students because I feel they are less likely to judge my opinion. However, sharing deeper things within my classes is more difficult as it is a bigger relational risk for me. Butttttttt, I am learning how to do this and how to be a smart woman in charge of my voice.
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing! This is super!