Wednesday, October 31, 2018

Authentically a Teacher

How close is too close? How open is too open?

After reading about authenticity and openness between Palmer and hooks primarily, I began to wonder if authenticity was all they cracked it up to be. Don't get me wrong, I think that both these writers are onto something, and that a teacher needs to be themselves to a certain degree. But I'm not sure that being completely open with your students is really the right answer, even within content-appropriate situations. I think it is possible to be authentic while still taking on the role of a teacher. I was certainly not completely "myself" on my first day of classes. I was partly myself, and partly what I felt that an ideal teacher should be.


...Okay, not completely ideal, but as close as I could get.

However, I think that there is a balance that needs to be struck between being one's authentic self and keeping a little bit of distance between self and students. This begs the question, how close is too close? How much do your students really need to know about you? Palmer and hooks are two of the writers whose pedagogy I identify with most closely, but because of that I have also scrutinized them more closely, and I think they may have gone a bit too far with the concept of teacher openness.



In fairness to these great thinkers and their ideas, though, I have not really tried being wholly open with my students. And to be honest, I think it's because I'm a bit scared. Giving a cursory introduction of myself and my interests is one thing, but it's a scary thought being entirely myself around these students. Perhaps after the end of this semester, once I have more clearly rounded out my pedagogy, I will take the plunge in front of another class. But for now, I think I will content myself with being authentically a teacher, if not wholly, authentically my weird, crazy self.
Keep it #highclass 🎩

hooking up with my educational philosphy


In my classroom, I tend to focus on relationship building with my students and I believe I've embodied the philosophies of both Friere and bell hooks. Recently, I had a encounter in one of my classes that troubled me. In class we were talking about diversity in group communication. I took this opportunity to have a gritty and raw conversation about "having a seat at the table." Many of my students expressed they didn't know what the term referred to, so I took the time to explain it. I then began a scenario with 12 straight white men sitting at the table. I began to probe my class to discuss the diversity and inclusion issue with this situation. We all agreed that "diversity in thought" is important, and yes, straight white men will all have varying thoughts, strategies and ideas BUT its still not allowing for multiple perspectives. I had a white male student who became visibly agitated with my commentary as I begin to incorporate other groups of people. When I inquired what would happen when two white women were invited to have a seat at the table, he physically shouted with a red face "WELL THEY'RE STILL WHITE SO NOT GOOD ENOUGH!" His sarcasm and apparent anger shifted the entire classroom dynamic and students who were engaged in the conversation, shut down. Quite honestly, I even was shut down. I completed the example but the entire classroom climate shattered and I was disappointed.  I had no idea what to say. As a black woman I begin questioning my image with my students. How was I being viewed? Am I the black teacher that rocks her afro and yells out "Black Lives Matter!" with a fist in the air to them? Do I have an agenda? Am I using reverse racism? (I have several students who believe this is a thing) I became extremely self-conscious about the materials that I would have to cover in class. After getting great advice from Karen and then reading bell hooks, I began to feel better about covering power, culture and all the uncomfortable topics that may put my students with privilege "in their feelings." #TheReal #InMyFeelings


Although, I had one student who was visibly upset, I still had 20+ students who were engaged and intrigued in the conversation. The learning environment had trans-formative qualities, and because I shut down as the instructor, I halted the productive learning environment. My fear stopped me. I mean who cares if my students think I'm a black activist? I mean, I am, so why am I concerned about what they think? Being my authentic self in the classroom is key for me. I'm learning that now.

After nine weeks of pedagogy, I finally believe I've met my soul-sister in theory, bell hooks. bell hooks says that trans-formative learning happens when critical thinking and literacy are combined. As we've talked about in orientation and class, we can't teach students to think critically but we can create a stimulating learning environment with engaged pedagogy. I'm ready for the next classroom encounter, I will not shut down and will take that opportunity to participate in creating a transformative learning environment.  #BerryBlues #TheReal

Monday, October 29, 2018

[jean valjean voice] who am i?

From Bain to Palmer to bell hooks, vulnerability, authenticity and self-identity are key to creating engaged pedagogical environments.

I must agree whole-heartedly. My own identity and authenticity are things I've struggled with until very recently. I was always told that I was "extra" or doing too much, and I've recently come to terms with the fact that I'm not "extra", I just have a clear sense of who I am and who I want to be. And some people can't handle that.


But the fact of the matter is that my sense of self-identity has enabled me to teach more thoroughly and helped me create a sense of confidence in myself that my students see directly. I've shown them my most authentic self (well, as authentic as appropriate) and in turn, my students have faith in my ability to teach them well. Sometimes this means I am vulnerable. Sometimes I feel so lost when it comes to material or when instructions are unclear, and I'm worried that this lost feeling will make my students lose trust in me, but I've decided to be sincere and direct with them - when I don't know what the hell is going on, I tell them that I'm unsure of the correct answer but that I will reach out to get them an answer. The students seem to really appreciate my transparency. While I worry that this will make me seem unprofessional, the appreciation from the students makes it worth it.


Perhaps the most rewarding thing is when I had a student come see me in my office to ask for advice because he could "tell that [I] genuinely cared about [my] students." I want them to know and understand that I do care about their success in the class and I will do my best to make sure they have opportunities to get help from me or whatever they might need that I have the ability to do for them. I am willing to listen, if they need it, or fight for extensions on their behalf if I think that they really need it. I want to be the TA that I would have wanted to have as an undergrad. I want to cultivate and combine all the things that made my past TAs great, and combine those traits with who I already am so that I can foster an engaged pedagogy. I can and will reach any zombie students and give my students the best learning environment possible. #SoCanYou


#TalesFromTheHall

Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Confessional Narrative: Flirting with Impostor Syndrome

The hardest things I’ve ever had to do without any choice or alternatives were to bury my beloved father, my sweet angel mother, and one dear sibling; and undergo an agonizing emergency laparoscopic cholecystecdomy (gallbladder removal).  These wretched events were bifurcating and painful.  I had no say in the matters.

Some majorly uncomfortable, yet surprisingly rewarding life events thus far include leaving a fulfilling job of seven years to move across the country for my husband’s first master’s degree; selling my inherited childhood home; electing to undergo LASIK eye surgery; aborting one career path to become a student again; and then choosing to work as a graduate teaching assistant.  I never in all my days thought I’d be teaching core curriculum at a university. 

Grad school as a TA is the hardest thing I’ve ever willingly chosen to do. 

In the half-semester I’ve been in the COMM TA program, I have developed a distinct, newfound heightened self-awareness.  I think I might be intimidating to some folks; especially young, inexperienced, white people from economically privileged backgrounds.  Of particular interest is how the young men tend to avert their hotly resentful eyes from mine, as if their gossamer views and fickle positions had never been challenged; at least never by a woman of color in a classroom setting.  #fromthefrontdesk

Of further particular interest are the sustained “stare downs” between me and the young white girls of apparent materially privileged backgrounds.  In their openly accusatory frowns, I can almost see their silent, freshly outraged, ALL CAPS thought balloons indignantly demanding, “What are you?”.  Almost as if they need me to justify my presence because they don’t see a mop or a bucket.

Ugly looks are not constrained to undergraduates.  Professors, graduate scholars, and teaching assistants remain painfully ignorant of their effusive nonverbals!  In Teaching to Transgress, bell hooks terms this a “blind spot in the vision of [people] who have profound insight to themselves”; they can discuss and process highly complex social theories, and yet remain so “profoundly unaware of their own biases and [in]capacity for true insight…the gap between theory and practice” (65).

What do these hostile oculesics really mean?

Rather than attend and graduate from college before marriage, my husband and I elected to marry and see each other through our respective scholastic journeys.  He attended Baylor University for undergraduate school and the University of Miami for his first master’s degree.  My experience as the undereducated spouse of a student at private universities was to quickly learn to painstakingly listen.  Watch.  I learned how to hide myself in plain view.  Disguise.  Practice the regional diction.  Blend.  Be aware of the little things that people who are wrapped up in themselves do not notice themselves doing.  Perform.

One particularly disturbing manifestation of applying this learned set of oppressor behaviors (in praxis) was to develop the “you smell like shit” face which I adopted while my husband studied at Baylor.  Something as innocuous as sharing a sidewalk with another pedestrian became a chance to show off my “you smell like shit” sneer.  Once the other party identified my “you smell like shit” stare as like them or one of them, they would eagerly raise their eyebrows and invert that repulsive frown into a myopically squinty false “social smile”; which would quickly relax back into its normal shitty look.  At UNT, I see this look reciprocated in the BLB far more frequently than in the GAB.  A product of what bell hooks calls “the culture of domination”; a highly valued culture where denizens become addicted to lying (to self) and denial (of self).  Where no one belongs, but everyone fits in.  #pleasedont

With that protracted assimilation, in combination with my past life as a performing arts center operations professional, I learned to do what bell hooks quantifies as learning to blend in and not give away what I really am; I acquired the ability to perform the part of middle-class normativity.  Accordingly, multitudes of people ask me for wayfinding directions.  What nonverbals do I send out?  Are dress, demeanor, age, vocabulary, good posture, and a sure step enough to convince them I really belong here?  The unapologetic silver in my hair; the wizened creases on my face?  I am a “ma’am” now.

Friere’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed was a great check to my development as a would-be oppressor.  I could easily see myself as an oppressed individual becoming an oppressor; quickly adopting the habits and customs of the dominant social majority to further assimilate and chameleon my way through life.  bell hooks’ Teaching to Transgress took my self-awareness to another level:  I must keep sustained vigilance against the oppressor syndrome!  I must actively break the oppressor cycle by continually embracing the pain of challenging the status quo; allowing myself to be my authentic, vulnerable self; and enforcing systemic resistance to dominant normative discourse and the white supremacist capitalist patriarchy through my actions and my very existence!  The hardest things I can ever choose to do.  #pleasedo

I am fortunate to have such a diverse, mature, and engaged group of students in my section of COMM 2020 this semester.  In my supreme privilege of spending one hour and 20 minutes a week with this excellent group of students, I am reminded of something we read pretty early on in Pedagogy, where Bain said something like,—I’m paraphrasing—“All we can do is make sure we don’t cause any permanent harm to them (the students)”.  I took on teaching as a job to try to work my way through grad school; a task; a duty to fulfill.  I like it more than I ever thought I would.  #fromthefrontdesk


Quiet, please!


I do enjoy strolling through the Union building in my travels on campus.  On Mondays and Wednesdays, I march from the GAB, through the Union Building’s broad corridor that perpendicularly intersects the main concourse, to reach the BLB to teach my sections of 1010.  The weather inside the Union is comfortable; predictably cool and dry.  I like the welcoming, densely urban din of the Union—the environment reminds me I am not actually in the middle of nowhere!  Someone is usually playing the piano and singing in the broad corridor.  #pleasedo

The Union is like a tiny port town.  Everything is there – a huge post office, a real Barnes & Noble, with an entirely separate Starbucks, so much food, and a richly diverse population!  Traversing the Union, I continue my trek across campus out-of-doors; it’s strangely silent.  I am met by the peculiar sight of hundreds of students mutely hurrying along the foot paths.  Eyes – averted.  Ears – plugged.  Determination – on.

Along my pedestrian voyages across campus, I was delighted to discover the quiet “eating lounges” in the Union.  Interior glass doors lead to quiet havens “away” from the loud, inefficient 4-top tables (usually hosting one occupant and three vacant seats), are separate, quiet areas.  I refrain from calling these monastically secluded dining areas “lunch rooms” because the term connotes the bustling socialization that usually occurs in a university dining hall.

Denizens of the eating lounges are usually solo, there simply to ingest food and knowledge.  Silently.  Audible masticating, the shuffling clink of ice in disposable cups, the punctuating rasp of a page turn, and the faint cochlear sound of music leaking through headphones are the only sounds that go unnoticed in this bookless library with long lunch tables instead of shelves.  The sounds of solitude peopled by scholarly thoughts.  Any other noises, even the resounding echo of a chair scraping the floor, are not welcomed and reticently side-eyed as an intrusion.

Occasionally, an intrepid pair of explorers will unwittingly trespass into a deafeningly muted eating lounge with a clatter of belongings slammed onto a table.  Our tentative pioneers are suddenly and starkly aware that it IS quiet.  They may loudly comment upon the silence,
“How awkward—let’s go!”; “They’re eating and they’re not talking”; or positionally ejaculate:
“There is something wrong here!”; before fleeing to the cacophony of the main dining areas.  We “silent majority” will inhale a relieved nasal sigh and return to our scholarly pursuits.

More observations on hostile nonverbals in future blogs.  #pleasedont