Saturday, October 17, 2015

The University’s Purpose: Should We Focus on Teaching or Preparing?

If you had to choose, would you say that the purpose of universities is (1) to teach students or (2) to prepare students for their future? I think universities provide something valuable: a higher education. I also think most people understand the important relationship between higher education and professional careers. Employers certainly see the connection (Donaldson et al., 1999) and so do parents (Ellis, 2012).

When I researched university mission statements, I was surprised to find several of them do not mention “profession” or “career.”

 Mission Statements that Mention Profession or Career
University Name
Yes or No
no
no
no
yes
yes
yes
no
no

Back to the original question, I believe universities must prepare students for careers. The reason they invest in higher education is to gain skills that make them marketable and help them get “good jobs.” As a bonus, students will also study topics outside of their future profession, which helps to expand their knowledge base. (Click here to participate in a pole on this topic or to see what others are saying.) Both are important; however, if universities only teach students (without actively preparing them for their future), how valuable is the end result?

Universities can prepare students for their future by guiding the way they relate to material. In higher education, we should do more than teach information; we also need to help students think on their own so that they are valuable to future employers. We can do this by helping students open their minds, think creatively, and learn to apply their “new” knowledge in real-world situations.

Here’s what experts tell us  about preparing students for their future:
  • Connect with the subject and students, and then help students “learn to weave a world for themselves” (Palmer, 1998, p. 11).
  • Encourage dialogue to understand their experience level and to have them reflect on situations (Freire, 1970).
  • Create experiences that engage students and help them grow (Dewey, 1938).
  • Disclose personal examples that show students “how you apply material to your own life” (Dannels, 2015, p. 128).
  • Be willing to acknowledge differences and be humble and authentic in the dialogue (Dannels, 2015).

Bottom line: Earning a degree is an investment of time and money. Students (and parents) think their ROI will be worth it. Let’s help students prepare for their future. Raise your hand if you agree.  

/ts

Resources
Dannels, D.P. (2015). 8 essential questions teachers ask: A guidebook for communicating with students. New York: Oxford University Press.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier.

Donaldson, J., Hinton, R., Nelson, L. (1999). Preparing students for life: The school-to-work reform movement. Horizon. Retrieved from http://horizon.unc.edu/projects/issues/papers/School_to_Work.html

Ellis, B. (2012). Parents to college kids: Live at home, get a job. CNN Money. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2012/08/29/pf/college/parents-college-debt/index.html

Friere, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Palmer, P.J. (1998). The courage to Teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

“What’s the purpose of universities? Is it to teach students or prepare them for good jobs?” (2013). Debate.org. Retrieved from http://www.debate.org/polls/what-is-the-purpose-of-universities-is-it-to-teach-students-or-prepare-them-for-good-jobs2/?cid=F520E9BC-284D-49A8-A30E-8EBBADF0FCC9

7 comments:

  1. Tracy,
    I think that by educating students, even if the content does not directly relate to their future careers, we are preparing them for their future careers. I believe that it is our job as educators to find a way to relate the content that we are teaching to our students' lives and futures. Of course, different situations will call for different measures and difficulties, but I strongly believe that it is possible for all content/subject matters to be connected and applied to "real-world" experiences.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Lauren! I agree with you: We prepare students for their future when we help them think critically about the content...or apply that content to real-world situations. We can strengthen their critical thinking skills on all kinds of subjects. Preparing them for their future involves much more than just teaching them the content of their major--it's also about helping them relate to content in all their courses. :)

      Delete
  2. Tracy,

    I think there are many shades of grey to what it is universities do. It does not have to be one or the other. A fully rounded education is not black and white. Universities should not limit themselves to providing students with a textbook education. There needs to be a practical side to education. We can learn by doing. This is why so many graduate students become Teaching Assistants. These teaching assistants learn by doing what it is they plan to do after they graduate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Shain! I absolutely agree with you about the grey areas. We definitely need to do both: to teach students and to prepare them for their future. I think by preparing them for their future we teach them--both go together. But I also think it's extremely important to strengthen their critical thinking skills in every subject. We need to help students relate to the content for knowledge transfer and so they can build on the info. By preparing them for their future, I mean we should do this (help them think critically) in all their courses, including their major and electives...I like your point about teaching as a graduate student. When I taught last fall, I learned a lot, and I certainly benefited from that experience. - T

      Delete
  3. Tracy,

    I found an article in The New York Times. I think you might find it interesting, especially considering it pertains to the purpose of a university education: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/education/edlife/03careerism-t.html?%20pagewanted=all&_r=0

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Shain! Interesting article. I think the writer makes a good point that the degree might not matter as long as the academic environment teaches students how to think for themselves. That way they can connect with the material and retrieve their new knowledge later. - T

      Delete
  4. Interesting post. I can see where the question of a university's purpose of either teaching students or preparing them for the future can be debatable. However, I would agree that a university's purpose should be to prepare students for the future. As instructors, you prepare your students and provide them with the skills necessary that look presentable to employers. It is our job to make our students shine in the world of employment. Once they are shiny like new pennies coming straight out of the bank, then we know that we have done our jobs as instructors. That can be a proud moment for all that uphold teaching positions.
    Thanks for the great read! :)

    ReplyDelete