Freire has
main key educational terms throughout Pedagogy
of the Oppressed: dialogue, praxis, banking model of education, and
problem-posing education. Each of these terms are important in understanding
the educational system that Freire has idealized. Throughout this blog, I will
be explaining ideal dialogue as Freire describes and then specifically
discussing how we can use popular culture to create the dialogue he suggests
for the classroom.
For Freire,
dialogue is true word that is at the same time praxis (1970). It is important
to understand that Freire believes that true dialogue can change the world. To
me, this is a very powerful statement. That means that I, as a teacher, have
the opportunity to enter into dialogue with
my students and change the world with them.
At first, this sounds easy; however, it is important to remember the
dialogue has to be true.
Freire
says, “For
the dialogical, problem-posing teacher-student, the program content of
education is neither a gift nor an imposition… but rather the organized,
systematized, and developed ‘re-presentation’ to individuals of things about
which they want to know more (1970).”
In my own words, this means to me that as the role of the
teacher, I need to remember that the best way to present new information to my
students is not as a gift, but as information that can represented and
interpreted differently. Information presented as questions that as a class as
a whole, we could develop answers, or not. We
can question the material using critical thinking.
The best way for me to explain how
I use popular culture to incorporate these critical thinking and true dialogue
into a classroom is to give an example. However, before I give this example, I
need to explain how I set up a lesson in my classroom.
Before I begin a lesson, I clarify
key terms that were presented throughout their readings. I recognize by having
students read a chapter, understand key terms, and then explain them to me, is
a form of the banking model Freire wants to eliminate. However, to have a
product and true dialogue, it is important all participates, including myself,
understand all key concepts. In my best attempt to avoid the banking system
when discussing key terms, I have the students put the definition in their own words
and give an example. After this, I engage their definition and examples and
question their responses.
I believe that pop culture can be
used as a way to begin the dialogue process. On Monday, I will be engaging my
students in a dialogue about rhetorical occasions, artistic proofs, and types
of arguments. Using this context, I am preparing a lesson that using popular
culture to engage the students (see previous blog) and create an effective
dialogue.
To begin the lesson, I will write Aristotle,
Burke, and Keith and Lundberg on the board. I am going to pass out expo markers
and have the students write the definitions of rhetoric according to these
scholars in their own words. After discussing what the students wrote, I am
going to show an Old Spice commercial (Click Hereto watch the commercial), and
as a class, we will use their definitions of rhetoric to dissect and explain
this commercial. This engagement exercise is to set up the conversation and
dialogue I hope my students and I can create together.
The final part of the lesson I am
going to mention in this blog is the dialogue I hope to have with my students
about rhetorical occasions (forensic, deliberative, and epideictic). After
participating in a similar engagement exercise about the rhetorical occasions,
I am going to ask the students to discuss within their groups to find an
example of one of the rhetorical occasions and present their findings to the
class.
The two main questions that will lead the dialogue are:
1) How does your example of rhetorical occasions add meaning to the definition of the specific
occasion?
With
this question, I am hoping the students will be able to explain their example,
and then the other groups will be able to provide agreements or disagreements about
the example or how the example could be expanded.
2) Do you think there are more rhetorical occasions besides the ones
listed that in your textbook?
This
is where I as a teacher, have the opportunity to learn something from my
students. I am truly curious to see if my students believe there are more
reasons for persuasion. By posing this question, I am asking my students not
only to take what they know about the topic, but to critic and critic the
scholars who present the information.
In summary, I have shown how using
the problem-posing education philosophy presented by Freire can be implemented
in the classrooms with popular culture. The popular culture can be presented by
the teacher, but also allowing for students to use popular culture to defend
definitions or arguments can hopefully create an environment that allows my
students and I to continue using and #doingpopculture together in our classroom.
Button Art – Pink Ribbon Love Plaque. (2011, October 19).
Retrieved October 10, 2015.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th
anniversary ed.). New York: Continuum.
Paulo Freire. (n.d.). Retrieved October 10, 2015.
Restoring Hope. (n.d.). Retrieved October 10, 2015.
Hi Suzanna. Great blog post! I especially like the way you organize the class activities. In the future, I'm going to use your idea: have them define key terms, watch a short entertaining video, and then have them relate their reading assignment to the video. . . Is this a 50 minute class session? Do you make all the students participate?
ReplyDeleteI usually call on different students to put key terms in their own words and if they don't know the answer, I have them pull out their book, read it, and then define it for me. I used to hate when professors used cold calling, but I try to create an atmosphere that is relaxed and they feel comfortable telling me they don't know an answer.
DeleteSuzanna,
ReplyDeleteFreire places pedagogy in a different light to that which I had previously viewed it. There is a reality presented in the work which many of us are not familiar with. This is not entirely all that surprising. Freire book was not originally written for an American audience. Despite this point, there are many aspects to what it is Freire wrote that a modern American audience can learn from.
Freire’s methodology indicates two distinct moments: the first moment includes becoming conscious of the reality we live in. The oppressed are subject to the decisions of the oppressors. The second moment pertains an initiative where the oppressed seek to fight the oppressors. The oppressed therefore become emancipated.