In 1938 John Dewey gave us Experience and Education, a book that offered both a critique of traditional and emerging progressive educational models, and an educational philosophy that attempted to put values like freedom, experience and individualization in a balanced and functional conversation with order, facilitation, and long-term sustainability.
Seventy-five years later, the educational system still has yet to comprehensively catch up. Though there have been widespread steps away from what Dewey called the "old school" (Let's pause and give Dewey credit for coining the phrase more than half a century before it became a Millenial catch phrase), those steps have been far from a critical, mass re-thinking of institutionalized education.
The contextual scenario is now infinitely more complicated than it was in 1938, and not simply because of the swiftly shrinking, globalizing, hyperconnected nature of the world circa 2013, but because of changes in our concepts of diversity and equity, the broadening expanse of "disciplines", the impact of postmodernity on social, cultural, and even educational philosophy...
In short, I mean to say the world has evolved faster than our system of education.
You don't say? |
Of course that disparity was, to an extent, inevitable. We're never going to stay ahead of change, but Dewey had some pretty radical things to say in 1938 that--though he has been distinguished and studied as the major voice in pedagogical theory over the course of the century--somehow missed being picked up in full by the educational bureaucracy and thus fell far short of their potential for revolutionizing academia any number of years before now.
Like in chapter one, when he points out that seeing the need for--and adopting--a new philosophy is not in and of itself the solution to the flaws in the old philosophy, nor is reacting in the violent and polarized opposite of a broken system necessarily any better than reiterating the broken system.
Or when he observed that, despite their intentions to educate a new generation in preparation for the future, present teaching methods actually treated contemporary knowledge as if it was this static, Truth-y thing that would never be altered by future discovery or cultural enlightenment, endowing us instead a mentally immobile generation with a massive distaste for learning.
I was fascinated when, in chapter five, Dewey reminded us that freedom is the means for learning, not the end. That teachers cannot know how best to cultivate learning for each student when the students have no freedom to express their individual differences, learning needs, and identities.
And again in chapter seven, though it seems so simple and obvious now, Dewey was the one to point out that no one can hope to learn a thing that does not conceptually begin, or have foundations, inside their realm of experience—that we cannot be expected to wrap our head around ideas that are entirely foreign—and that teachers must consciously select a stepping off point that is within the existing knowledge of the student and create learning as a series of gradual steps expanding outward from that point. How neat was the idea that we could treat not all old experiences and memories as fixed, but as potential to be written in new language that opens up the floor to new knowledge in a way that is interesting and engaging to the learner?
So this spurred me to sit and think about my Reddit project and how it related to some of Dewey’s key propositions of experiential learning:
☐ The philosophy of experiential education begins with the assumption that we are naturally and socially inclined to learn from our experiences as our primary means of making sense of the world.
☐ It is not enough to merely foreground experience as the ideal learning opportunity, but quality experience that is both immediately interesting and contributive to long-term growth.
☐ The primary job of the educator is to use their expertise to create opportunities for students to have quality learning experiences, by implementing a structure that balances the hand of organization and guidance with students’ individual freedom to negotiate their own purpose and methods of learning.
☐ To accomplish this, an instructor must create a path of learning that begins within the learner’s realm of experience, accounts for the diverse environmental factors that each student brings to the table, and proceeds gradually, building on the foundations of prior experiences, as is the most reasonable expectation for progress.
My vision
for the Reddit classroom project is this: Begin with a subreddit dedicated to
the course, ideally creating a virtual space that promotes group
identification, inclusivity, and entertaining discursive participation.
Divide the course itself into thematic units—UNT Comm
classes have done a solid job of this already. For Intro to Communication it
might look much the same: a foundations unit that highlights various overall
communication models like social constructionism, followed by subsequent units
that focus on particular perspectives: power structures in society, feminist
criticism, communication as performance, etc. The objective is for the learners
to, by the end of the term, have a broader and more critical understanding of the
different ways communication can be approached and understood, and why it is
useful to have that variety of models for understanding.
For each unit, create its own subreddit. Within these thematic forums, learners are
encouraged to find texts from popular culture to analyze from the standpoint of
the current unit, recall relevant examples from their own experiences, even
share personal narratives and connect them to the concepts.
√ The philosophy of experiential education begins with the assumption that we are naturally and socially inclined to learn from our experiences as our primary means of making sense of the world.
First
principle met! And because the challenge is to use these past experience to
develop their critical thinking skills for viewing, interpreting, and
responding to their future encounters with the world…
√ It is not enough to merely foreground experience as the ideal learning opportunity, but quality experience that is both immediately interesting and contributive to long-term growth.
Second
principle: Check!
For me, the most important factor of this project is that
learners are to use the comment system to extend the conversations into
dialogues in a way that previous “blogging” learning tools have not been able
to stimulate. I am opposed to setting the expectation for each student to reply
to their peers in blocks governed by the minimum word count.
I see Reddit as a
solution for its ability to spark conversation, and even debate, in as many
words as it naturally takes to keep the students participating in a
back-and-forth, rather than submitting their 250-word peer responses and promptly
removing themselves from conversation and severing any possibility for meaningful,
extended discourse. It would be naïve to assume I could achieve this naturally.
After all, most of the students are not likely to be familiar with Reddit and
for those who are, well, even if they have some familiarity with the critical
side of Reddit, most of their sense of its usefulness and entertainment value
as a social media probably looks like
Let’s be real for a moment. Reddit is the land of trolls.
The land of clever one-liners. Puns, communal inside-jokes, cheap shots, and
shock value are prioritized almost above all else. Though thoughtful
conversation can be found there already,
it’s not by any means the norm. In fact, it’s hidden amongst the countless
threads that Dewey would describe as problematic (or “mis-educative”)
experience for this purpose because back-grounding the thoughtful reflection
for the humor-shot, while immediately entertaining, doesn’t do much for one’s
potential for long-term growth. This is the problem that I face because I have
decided to experiment with Reddit as my social-media learning tool of choice.
This is
where the role of the instructor, as course-builder and Dewey-ian hand of
maturity, becomes necessary to consider. How am I going to control for the
tendency (that Dewey claimed students had) towards immediate amusement over
longer-term learning development, especially in this context where it seems to
be such an apparent danger?
I envision
the first few days of class to be dedicated to setting up and strengthening the
implemented structure: using icebreakers and activities to strengthen the sense
of social connectedness amongst students, and then to have an orientation to
Reddit that familiarizes students with the medium and also creates an
opportunity for the class to build their own contract for learning and behavior
expectations when using Reddit.
The key is
allowing the students agency to participate in creating their own mechanism of social
control, but having enough—and only enough--of a hand in contributing to the
process so as to build personal credibility and establish my role as a facilitator.
This doesn’t mean giving students the ultimate freedom to set rules that don’t
lead towards quality learning, but keeping in mind our ultimate purpose of developing long-term experiential learning
skills and designing expectations that are conducive to this, but customized to
the desires of the class.
After the
orientation period, my plan entails briefly previewing concepts before each unit opens up on Reddit, to
kindle the spark of understanding enough that learners are sufficiently
prepared to converse on the subject, and then synthesizing the conversations
that students collaborated in on the Reddit subforums in a dedicated in-class
follow-up which aims to reinforce explicit and critical connections of the
concepts, experiences, and future implications, reserving enough time at the
end of the follow-up discussion to preview and define the next concept and
begin the cycle anew.
√ The primary job of the educator is to use
their expertise to create opportunities for students to have quality learning
experiences, by implementing a structure that balances the hand of organization
and guidance with students’ individual freedom to negotiate their own purpose
and methods of learning.
Appropriate
structuring that gives students agency… also check!
So overall
my vision involves a preliminary discussion that helps to enhance students’
understood definition of a concept and provide them with a vocabulary to engage
in critical discourse about the concept, and then give them the freedom to, in
a social virtual environment, actively participate in conversations that
explore these concepts according to the experience that each learner brings to
the table (their text, artifact, or narrative for sharing). Through those
dialogues I expect learners to be enabled to strengthen their connections of
experience to concept, to similar situations they might experience in the
future, and then bring the now critically empowered and more knowledgeable
learning group back together to synthesize their discoveries.
√ To accomplish this, an instructor must create
a path of learning that begins within the learner’s realm of experience,
accounts for the diverse environmental factors that each student brings to the
table, and proceeds gradually, building on the foundations of prior experiences,
as is the most reasonable expectation for progress.
…. Dare I
say it?
Perhaps I
am being optimistic about the promise this vision shows on paper, but over the past
three weeks, I have attempted to sharpen the blurry edges of a vague idea into
a plan while being faithful to some of my favorite learning philosophies put
forward by Dewey, Jarvis, Garrison, and Vaughan. Among the greatest
contribution from the readings was the illumination of possible problems that
emerge, and each scholar’s theories on solving the problems not from an
immediate, bandaging approach but from the roots. I believe their comprehensive
perspectives enabled me to figure out my own specific strategies, adapted to my
personal vision and educational setting from the bottom up, and I feel more
confident and excited than ever to see my vision enacted into reality.
C.C.
C.C.,
ReplyDeleteI thoroughly enjoyed reading this! You presented a solid argument for bringing reddit into the classroom. Spoiler alert: I will be the contrarian in this dialogue.
How do you propose keeping the reddit experience from devolving into a “mis-educative” trolling extravaganza? Dewey (1938) discusses the downside of traditional education and how “it imposes adult standards, subject-matter, and methods upon those who are only growing slowly toward maturity” (pp. 19-20). Does this educational experience give students too much freedom, while expecting them to adhere to “adult standards”?
For me, the logical step is to assign a grade to the student for her, her* or his contributions. As an instructor, that can become burdensome. We each teach three classes with 20-30 students each. When I do the math, that comes out to a boatload of reading, not only for grading, but to be able to participate in classroom discussions over the topics and ideas addressed.
I think this is a great idea, but as an instructor, I’m not entirely sold on how it would function in the classroom. I would love to hear more about how you plan to develop the model.
-C.H.
*I took this opportunity to double up on female pronouns. I suspect these did not exist prior to WWII.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteC.C.,
ReplyDeleteI think C.H. brings up a good point regarding the challenges in keeping the reddit experience a "positive" educational experience. I argue that the concept of "traditional" education in and of itself, along with the presence of consequences (in the form of grades) aides you in facilitating guided learning.
Although this wouldn't work for 1010 students, your concepts may be better applied to a course in which the majority of the grade comes from their contributions (as opposed to papers or tests). The problem such an alternative stems from the short term nature of using grades as consequences, especially in light of Dewey's (1938) argument that "the educator by the very nature of *[her/her/his] work is obliged to see [her/her/his] present work in terms of what it accomplishes, or fails to accomplish, for a future whose objects are linked with those of the present" (p. 76).
How would go about balancing between cultivation of purpose and allowing freedom of intelligence?
B.L. #4
*I suspect female pronouns existed prior to WWII, but were neither seen or heard.